Political Theories Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Political Theories - Essay ExampleEvery society is made up of groups of individuals that gather in certain hopes and aspirations either state is made of deal that want to find a way to find solutions for their growing demand and desires to achieve things and make a living for themselves as well as to support their families. This in time sometimes is at the cost of others and so a proper political, social as well as stinting structure needs to be set in place in score to avoid conflicts among people. A certain amount of competition and conflict is allowed because it nevertheless helps to push the psychology of a human being and help him find unique ways to do things in a better manner however, if stretched, this buns lead to the existence of a majority group that begins to gain all the benefits of resources and services. Individuals often know what is stovepipe for them and thus they come together in parade to make decisions which they feel would be fit for everyone else. T hey think for others and often try to come up with ideas that would suit the vivificationstyle of most people within that particular society. This refers to rule or policy formulation on a political basis and gaining power for a purpose in order to serve the needs of the people. However, this power sometimes may not be distributed in an even manner causing problems within that society and having a certain section confabulate its influence upon the others because of the excess of power. Since the inception of the idea of democracy within a state, various theories have been developed in order to find out the best possible manner in which democracy is to be executed among the people. Some societies try their best to establish a clean political scenario within which people can live peacefully with each other, sharing resources and producing goods and services in a very harmonised manner. However, within some societies, this distribution may sprain haywire and concentrated within the hands of a few individuals. This obviously might not be good for the general benefit of the entire state, however might help a few individuals gain a lot, thus leading to an overall growth in the entire income structure of the state. The economy is thus divided on the basis of both sociological as well as political perspectives in order to counter these issues and move towards prosperity. Political life can be measured through sociological variables and this helps to understand the class model of the society very easily. There have been a number of philosophers and thinkers who have been able to base their theories on class and model structures within a political economy. Nonetheless, the Marxian philosophy or theory of class structure of state has had the superior impact on political sociology and his most dynamic work may be found in economics. Every political dodge is made up of individuals who react to their sociological surroundings and determine the political life. In the p resent day, three theories have been used greatly the Marxist, Pluralist and the Elitist theories that deal with different (as well as similar) ideas of democracy. This paper helps to analyse the similarities as well as the differences among these three ideas, as well as the path that led up to their establishment in the novel day and age. It also aims to focus on the political system that prevails in the United Kingdom and the course that the same took over time in order to become what it is today. According to Karl Marx, people entered into social relationships with one another their conduct was largely determined by the way they behaved around each other as well as the reactions to the actions of other people in their surroundings. People moulded their beliefs and ideas according to the needs and wants of the people within their external environment and thus the political system was loosely based on the economic scenario of demand and supply. Marxs theory talked considerably ab out competition and conflict that was created due to economic production he said that men and women could only be free within a society